Isn’t it interesting, that in the Illustrated Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the image used for Article 16 in regards to marriage is… one man and one woman.
(1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.
(2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.
(3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.
You’ll also notice that it describes the union as natural, and that this is the “fundamental group unit of society” that ought to be protected by society and the State. Not only that, but it does not specify that marriage can’t be limited by “sexual orientation”, only race, nationality and religion.
Finally, the declaration states that the human right is – to marry and found a family. Homosexuals cannot produce children without a third party, this is a biological fact. So what makes them think this human right applies to their unnatural union? And if it does, why are we believing the lies when we are told – legalising same-sex “marriage” will have no effect on children and the definition of “family”?
When a recent advertisement honouring Father’s Day is now classified as a political ad because of an upcoming postal plebiscite on same-sex “marriage”… somehow I find it hard to believe…
(I am in no way defending the United Nations or the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as my basis of truth, only the Word of God has that place. But I raise this point because I assume this is the document on which they are basing this argument.)